| Model number | DL62610Q-size5 | Gem Type | Amethyst |
| Minimum total gem weight | 1.00 carats | Ring size | 5 |
| Stone Weight | 1.00 carats | Material | Metal |
| Setting | Prong | Length | 3 millimeters |
| Number of stones | 1 | Metal | Sterling Silver |
| Brand Seller or Collection Name | YL | Metal stamp | 0.925 |
| Diameter | 3 millimeters | Width | 3 millimeters |
Joel Lawrence
Overall: Recommended! Impressed by the style and the beautiful look. This was a gift and it was well received. Seems like it will last. Bright and beautiful. Cheers!
Jennifer Bean
This ring is listed as being 925 sterling silver and while I can’t tell you for sure that it is that, I believe it could be. It’s beautifully smooth and shiny, and looks like other sterling silver items I have, so I believe it could be. Even if it isn’t, I still honestly love it. I can’t wear my actual wedding rings at work due to it being a lab, and I also don’t like to wear them while traveling because you never know what will happen. So I’ve ordered a couple of rings or ring sets here and there to wear instead, but haven’t found any that I’m in love with. This one though… it’s by far my favorite ring, after my own wedding rings! It’s beautifully dainty and has a similar criss cross pattern to my own rings. The gems / criss cross is actually a little bit smaller in person than I was expecting, but I still love it. Due to it being small the sparkle isn’t as obvious as on other pieces, but it’s still there. Honestly, I would just like to see this ring offered in more sizes. First because my normal ring size is a 5.5, but no half sizes are offered. And second because I think it would make a STUNNING toe ring being so dainty… but I need a size 4 for that. If it were offered in more sizes I’d order this again in a heartbeat!
Joshua Burnett
The rings are very well-made and are really pretty. The stones have great sparkle. They are elegant yet casual. The fit is true to size and they are comfortable to wear. They are beautifully packaged and would make a fantastic gift.
Joshua Garcia
This is a good quality ring that is made well and will wear well for years to come. I got this in a larger size than I normally wear in order to be able to wear it on my larger fingers with other rings. The sizing is true. The gems are sparkly, and the silver is shiny. The gems are very small, and it is difficult to tell the color of the gems from any distance. It is debatable to me if the price of $40 is worth it or not. I guess it depends on your wants. This is beautiful, well made, and dainty, so if that is what you are looking for, then this would be worth it.
Misty Washington
Beautiful little ring. I have small hands and am always looking for more petite pieces, this is it.I love the different design. It is very unique and looks great on my finger. I ordered my usual size and the fit was perfect.
Dale Barnes
The deep Purple looks better in person. These types of jewelry tend to reflect our environments. So these pictures don't really do them justice. Only you know the events you have planned so you can have an idea of how it will react. I really like how this ring looks over a candlelit dinner! The ring size was correct!
Linda Greer
Reviewing YL X Ring 925 Sterling Silver Stackable Rings, This ring is very understated & simple, which is what makes it pretty. It’s almost TOO understated, but it skirts that boundary well. The listing says it’s 925 Sterling Silver, electroplated with 18K white gold. It’s stamped 925. It did not react to a magnet & I put it in a glass of water, it sunk right away. Both of those things apply to sterling silver & gold, so I can’t say if it’s real gold plating or not, but I’m happy with the silver.I ordered a size 10, and it fits well and looks very elegant. The stones are clear, not cloudy and seem to be set well. They are tiny, though. None are loose. For how understated the ring is, it’s surprisingly thick & took some getting used to. I wear it on my ring finger & it hits my pinky right at the knuckle, so I can’t squeeze my pinky in because of the thickness of this ring. I did, eventually get used to it though & I think if you wear it on a finger other than your ring finger, you won’t notice the thickness. This is a good value for $50.
Mrs. Theresa Kelly
For $50, I was expecting a much more substantial silver ring. Yes, it is cute and elegant, but it is also super thin and the embedded stones are minuscule. The sizing is a bit big: normally a 9 would fit my middle finger, but it's way too loose so I have to wear it on my finger.
