Patrick King
Skagen Men's Signatur Three-Hand Gold-Tone Stainless Steel and Black Leather Band Watch (Model: SKW6897)This watch is *really* nice looking. My husband loves how thin it is and loves the look which has a clean, minimalist, almost Movado-like look. Very classy and understated. The gold tone looks great with his two tone wedding band.I paid $83.99 for it and see that it is even cheaper now... $62.50. It is a really great value for $84! We highly recommend it!

Danielle Nguyen
This is my 3rd Skagen over the years and they hit the sweet spot with their watches. They have clean lines, are slim in design, and good quality. They feel like the watch equivalent of mid-century modern furniture.

Amanda Shah
Alright, so this is a very nice watch, especially for the price. But full disclosure, I can't keep this. I specifically wanted a sweeping second hand watch, which this is not. (My fault not seeing "quartz", but also Amazon's fault for their terrible search filter, which probably includes reviews.) Another review described the watches second hand as "sweeping", which (admittedly foolishly on my part) gave me hope this was smooth movement. Its quartz movement, which is a per-second tick. (NOT high bph like 21600 or 28000 bph.) But, that being said, its very quiet, even with my very sensitive hearing. I can barely hear it at 5 inches away in a quiet room. I'm sure it would be inaudible at 20 inches down by my side at night when sleeping.Now, I'm not a shnob for quality, but another review said "the second hand is misaligned with the watchface" and this is true. Mine is too. (Check photo.) I personally could live with it, but it would be a bit annoying for actual accurate countdown timing.The leather band is nice. It's 20mm. It has a tool-less release. It's real leather, sealed thickly to a smooth polish, not fuzzy with hairs. The metal clasp is brushed metal, black. Nice touch.The case is 7mm thin. Not thick at all, something I prefer. In fact, the whole reason I bought this was the thin case, as I slide my arms in tight spaces often and absolutely HATE (with a passion) thick watches and arm bands that get caught. So, including the crown, I measured 41mm. Without, it's about 39mm. Top to bottom is 46mm (from the top pair of rod-holders to the bottom pair). The leather bands are 2.5mm thick. Total watch length (excluding the clasp) is 9.5", or 235mm. There are two band-holder loops for the excess band. The one nearest to the clasp is affixed to the band and does not move. The second one is loose and slides along the band. There are 10 notch holes in the band.The lume (glow in the dark) is okay I guess. It's better than nothing. Personally, I don't understand the point of passive glow-in-the-dark lumes on a battery-powered watch, since the lume charge only last like 15-20 minutes, even with intense light. Like seriously, why aren't all watched lit with tritium? It's not even that expensive, like $10-15 for a few indicators. Also, coming from a smartwatch with tilt-to-brighten, these short-lived lumes are just painfully annoying. Any watch I get will get the tritium treatment. (Mixglo sells wide varieties of shapes.)Lastly, the glass seems to have a tiny bit dusty, and I think it's on the inside. Again, not a shnob, I couldnt care less. Doesnt really affect my ability to glance at the time. But, if this is brand new (it is not, clearly been opened before), why's it dirty? I wouldn't mind taking it apart and cleaning it, but I know most other people are not willing to clean it, which is unacceptable by their standard.So anyways, it's a lovely watch, minus those imperfections. I would keep it, but I've got some odd (lets be honest: unfair) stringently specific requirements for my time-pieces.

Valerie Hall
In low light the second hand and minute hand are hard to distinguish. The band is a bit cheap feeling leather. But it's a very stylish, simple, low-cost watch.

Keith Williams
This is great watch at this price, especially when compared to some of the similarly-priced, but low-grade watch brands being hyped on social media. With a 40mm case and a 46 mm lug-to-lug length, it fits comfortably on small-to-medium wrists (like mine). The band is easily detachable using a simple spring-loaded catch on the end of each strap, so you could swap out other 20mm bands of this type for different occasions. The watch back can be removed without any special tools and uses a standard SR621 battery.Although I didn’t see it mentioned anywhere here on Amazon, the dial markers and hands are luminescent. It arrived in a minimalistic, eco-friendly gift box that fits the style of the watch.Overall, I really like it. Looks clean and simple, perfect for a casual day out, and fits comfortably once the leather has had a chance to break in.

Jessica Patrick
I'm impressed! Very simple and classy looking.

Tyler Petersen
The simplicity and the elegance of the design is great. This watch is meant to do one and only one thing - tell the current time accurately. So far, it seems to be doing that quite well. Love the adjustable metal strap, the matte black finish and the understated light grey lines on the black dial. Everything is subtle. Just simple elegance.No dislikes.

Eileen Chapman
The colors are amazing. The size/feel is very minimalistic. My biggest issues are the strap which after a bit of use has started scoring at the hole I use and feels like cardboard every time I put it on. The other is the second hand. The watch has marks for all the seconds but the hand never points to the mark, it always falls in between the marks thus you are never able to tell the seconds. In terms of price having experience all this, this watch is not worth over $100 or even the $66 I paid. A Timex will have better quality and will properly show me the seconds. At this point it turned into a nice accessory to wear rather than a watch to use for reading time.