Mrs. Susan Tucker
Bought looking for a digital GMT watch for work while traveling. Was looking at the Casio AQ 230 but this homage watch had several advantages over that one so I took a punt on it and am glad I did. What's better: plated metal case vs coated plastic (more durable and substantial), 20mm lug width (easily swapped bracelet with better one seen in pic vs 18?), BACKLIGHT! (only on digital window but apparently Casio has none?), price (this cost less then $20 while Casio is $50?), and the case is larger (33mm vs 30mm width). Otherwise, the features are the same as far as I can tell: ability to set 3 time zones, alarm, stopwatch. What's not great: iffy bracelet (why I swapped), shiny polished case (plated), gap between case and bracelet (though this may make straps fit better). Some of the downsides are the same as Casio (except gap). Per the case and bracelet I believe this watch weighs more but it's still not a heavy watch. I chose the silver face and I think this helps offset the polish on the case, since with the bracelet it looks more like a design choice for contrasting surfaces. The dial has a nice sunburst price, elevating the look. For the price it's a really good piece of kit.

Alicia Kelly
I bought the exact same watch in 2019 (i.e. four years ago). I liked it because of the conservatively elegant style (gold) and, especially, the digital/analog combination which is hard to find in a dressy watch. I also liked the simplicity of the controls, the timer (which I frequently use), having two screens with the time (useful for daylight-saving changes or for when traveling across time zones), and the light-up screen for use in the dark. Yes, after a couple of years some of the gold finish started to wear off, but not so much that anyone ever noticed. And it kept time well. About two months ago it started to die: first the light-up screen went, then the little metal pieces indicating numbers on the dial started falling off; then it eventually just stopped. But previously I had bought a similar watch, made by a more well-known brand and more expensive: it only lasted 3 years. So I think this one (lasting 4 years) is a pretty good deal for the price. The new one (which I just received) came with a little tool to help in removing links when adjusting the band size. That was a nice idea, but it bent as soon as I started hammering. So I used a thin nail instead. I still had a hard time removing the link, but eventually got it—and avoided having to pay a watchmaker to do it!

Carlos Curtis
love the watch and stack it with other pieces. i’ve gotten compliments already ! light weight also

Brett Alvarado
Looks really nice and the weight on these casio clones is nice because they use metal instead of plastic. However the bracelet is fairly nasty, pulling my hairs constantly. The backlight on the digital portion works very well though it does make a slight buzzing noise when activated. For the price it's not awful. I'm wearing it now.

Jennifer Smith
i bought this watch and a $200 one. I like the look of this better than the expensive one. The case is well made and looks awesome with the digital and analog display. The watchband is pretty cheap and you can hear and feel it so I am replacing it with a new stainless steel one to make the watch feel better on my wrist.

Melinda Graham
I needed this watch for a very important reason and it is broken before I could use. I am out of state and i can not send it back on time.Please advice.

Heather Jones
Got this for a friend... she loved it.. Great gift idea.. this worth every penny.

Scott Green
A little thicker than the Casio original, but it's a nice homage of the classic. Unfortunately, the watch bracelet is horrific. If you scrape the side of it against your face, you can get a shave. Trying to sand the cutting edges would probably remove the gold-colored plating.